The two terms are used interchangeably and they should not be. They solve different problems, are priced differently and produce different assets.
Influencer marketing buys attention
You are paying for access to an existing audience. Success depends on audience fit, credibility in the category and the creator's own editorial judgement. The output lives on their channel.
UGC buys assets
You are paying for content produced in a creator-native style that you own and distribute. Audience size is largely irrelevant; craft, appearance on camera and script delivery matter far more.
For beauty specifically, UGC must handle texture, shade accuracy and application. This is a production discipline, not a casting exercise.
How to combine them
Use UGC to build a rights-cleared library that feeds paid social continuously. Use influencer partnerships selectively, where a specific voice adds credibility your brand cannot claim itself.
Both should execute the same concept. Otherwise the brand sounds different everywhere it appears.
Related services